<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>SolidSmack - Latest Comments in Who&amp;#8217;s In Charge of The SolidWorks Real Logo?</title><link>http://solidsmack.disqus.com/</link><description>SolidWorks 3D CAD Technology Design Blog</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:06:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Who&amp;#8217;s In Charge of The SolidWorks Real Logo?</title><link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-marketing-real-logo/2008-03-05/#comment-5092928</link><description>sorry, my humor doesn't strike everyone as funny :) it could be the idea that of a cow using solidworks or perhaps the 'Real' attributes of modern cow udders. leaves one to ponder.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshmings</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:06:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who&amp;#8217;s In Charge of The SolidWorks Real Logo?</title><link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-marketing-real-logo/2008-03-05/#comment-5051052</link><description>Could someone please tell me what is so funny here?  I see the cow and the orange real box but then again at my level of expertise I only see it as what it is which is a cow and an orange box.  Of course too, I just found this post if that can tell you anything about me. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">weewilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:44:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who&amp;#8217;s In Charge of The SolidWorks Real Logo?</title><link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-marketing-real-logo/2008-03-05/#comment-4165605</link><description>I cringe at the day when PETA will start opposing the embarrassment/slaughter of digital/virtual animals - I'm almost certain they do. ahy. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joshmings</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 10:08:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who&amp;#8217;s In Charge of The SolidWorks Real Logo?</title><link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-marketing-real-logo/2008-03-05/#comment-4148858</link><description>I'm not sure if this is offensive to women, but as a cattle farmer, I am deeply offended.  I think I'll call PETA.  :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick Carter</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 12:11:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who&amp;#8217;s In Charge of The SolidWorks Real Logo?</title><link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-marketing-real-logo/2008-03-05/#comment-1300608</link><description>It's always good to compare, especially with the price tags of this stuff.  I'm not sure what you have on your radar Josh, you seem pretty plugged in to what's out there.  Catia emerged from the aerospace industry where there was a need to represent complex mathmatical surfaces.  On the V6 note, there are two things - Version 6 which won't be released for several years and a new V6 designation for an all online product set.  For all you SolidWorks users out there, there is a really cool new brand from Dassalut called 3DVIA that, among other things, easily  facilitates the creation of technical documentation.  Google it and find the website if that is part of your job, there are free downloads to play with (if you can get it to work!)  I'm going to end this blog before I start sounding like a corporate marketing goon!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jon Doe</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 10:36:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who&amp;#8217;s In Charge of The SolidWorks Real Logo?</title><link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-marketing-real-logo/2008-03-05/#comment-1300604</link><description>Yep sir, Catia is pretty good stuff. I think if what your designing demands some higher end surfacing its good to look at and compare. V6 stuff is going to be interesting for sure.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:49:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who&amp;#8217;s In Charge of The SolidWorks Real Logo?</title><link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-marketing-real-logo/2008-03-05/#comment-1300606</link><description>Very interesting, my company works with SolidWorks parent - developer of CATIA V5.  Believe me, it's also frustrating working with a company that owns 2 MCAD brands that compete directly against each other.  &lt;br&gt;All joking aside though, SolidWorks is a great 3D solid modeling kernal - I don't care what anyone says.  I've spent years doing competitive analysis of high end PLM.  My experience has shown that even though SW is a great product desing tool for the mass market, eventually you "hit a wall" and need a process-centric design tool like CATIA.  Believe me, if Boeing can develop planes with it - you can make what ever it is you need to as well.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jon Doe</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:32:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who&amp;#8217;s In Charge of The SolidWorks Real Logo?</title><link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-marketing-real-logo/2008-03-05/#comment-1300602</link><description>Josh - this is hysterical - I love it! Maybe you should apply for a job on the SolidWorks Marketing team?!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Laura Kozikowski</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:30:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who&amp;#8217;s In Charge of The SolidWorks Real Logo?</title><link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-marketing-real-logo/2008-03-05/#comment-1300592</link><description>As the former Director of Marketing Operations at SolidWorks, now you can see why I left the company.  It is this careless miss-treatment of our bovine citizens and blatant disregard for decent logo standards that cause me to have a mental breakdown and have to leave the company.  What's next?  A black and white cow colored box?  A "real" logo brand for cows on the SolidWorks ranch in Concord, MA?  Only serving milk at SolidWorks World?  When does it stop???&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Mike Volpe (seriously, I really used to work in SolidWorks Marketing)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PS - The folks are SolidWorks are cool and we still love each other.  I went to a startup after 4 wonderful years at SolidWorks and I miss the people there still.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Volpe</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:57:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who&amp;#8217;s In Charge of The SolidWorks Real Logo?</title><link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-marketing-real-logo/2008-03-05/#comment-1300600</link><description>Your killing me Josh, the chuckles won't stop and I will probably have weird dreams about this tonight.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rod Uding</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 12:54:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who&amp;#8217;s In Charge of The SolidWorks Real Logo?</title><link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-marketing-real-logo/2008-03-05/#comment-1300598</link><description>Look at Inventor's Packaging</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Al Dean</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 12:25:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who&amp;#8217;s In Charge of The SolidWorks Real Logo?</title><link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-marketing-real-logo/2008-03-05/#comment-1300587</link><description>yeah, this was definitely not meant to be offensive. I was going to use a photo of sea otters, but a good sea otter photo is hard to come by.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 08:02:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who&amp;#8217;s In Charge of The SolidWorks Real Logo?</title><link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-marketing-real-logo/2008-03-05/#comment-1300596</link><description>That is udderly ridiculous....(Sound bad joke drum beat here) Great work!!!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ben</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:14:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who&amp;#8217;s In Charge of The SolidWorks Real Logo?</title><link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-marketing-real-logo/2008-03-05/#comment-1300594</link><description>Matt,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am female and I didn't find it any of those things you are talking about... It's just a cow... OK, the location of the logo is kind of cute, but better on a cow than on a bull... Hmmm... If it had been a bull and the logo had been placed more or less "there", would the male population consider it sexist and vulgar? Would a few guys feel that it's an attack to their self esteem? That they are being,  well, "belittled"? "Less than", even? ;-) OK, I'm still operating on high levels of caffeine...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gabi</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 16:40:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who&amp;#8217;s In Charge of The SolidWorks Real Logo?</title><link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-marketing-real-logo/2008-03-05/#comment-1300590</link><description>I love it!  This has moved up the big board of my favorite pictures.  And then to follow it up with Matt's comment has made my day.  Happy milking, err I mean mopping Matt and thanks for the pic Josh.  That's awesome!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Raak</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 14:14:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who&amp;#8217;s In Charge of The SolidWorks Real Logo?</title><link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-marketing-real-logo/2008-03-05/#comment-1300588</link><description>Heh. Excellent.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charles</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:56:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who&amp;#8217;s In Charge of The SolidWorks Real Logo?</title><link>http://www.solidsmack.com/solidworks-marketing-real-logo/2008-03-05/#comment-1300584</link><description>C'mon, you're not fooling us, photoshop dude. We all know that the SW marketing people were tragically born without the "sense of humor" gene They are incapable of putting together an image like that. Plus, aren't they female, and they'd probably consider this vulgar and sexist, not to mention belittling of those who seek silicone enhancement of their self-esteem. "Real" udders are tres gauche.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personally, I had to mop up a bit of ice tea I sprayed on the keyboard and monitor through my nose when I saw it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Lombard</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:46:37 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>