-
Website
http://www.solidsmack.com/ -
Original page
http://www.solidsmack.com/007-what-you-want-to-know-about-solidworks-2008-sketching-and-features/2007-06-20/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Charles Culp
39 comments · 3 points
-
JeffMirisola
21 comments · 3 points
-
bcourter
22 comments · 2 points
-
MatthewWest
32 comments · 2 points
-
Bruce Buck
78 comments · 7 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Should I Wait to Vomit 3D CAD or Move to Windows 7 and #SolidWorks 2010? Win a SpacePilot PRO (RT This!!)
1 day ago · 29 comments
-
The New Terror of Bike Paths Around the World. Wheel Skates.
1 day ago · 2 comments
-
SolidWorks 1-upin’s AutoDesk on Conference Keynote. James Cameron Headlining #SWW10
3 days ago · 9 comments
-
Where Can You Score a Sweet SolidWorks Rig? SolidBox.
1 week ago · 10 comments
-
Flattening a Non-linear Conical Surface in SolidWorks. Is it Possible?
1 week ago · 12 comments
-
Should I Wait to Vomit 3D CAD or Move to Windows 7 and #SolidWorks 2010? Win a SpacePilot PRO (RT This!!)
i apreciate and want to know more
thank you
It was not as full-on "serious" as ProE, Slightly less than SolidEdge, but not as Bright and Gaerish as Inventor.
This looks too like Inventor, not enough quality feel to it.....
WHY??????
I'm also hit sidewasy by the "Boss to a Cut and Back", this is functionality present in both ProE and Inventor, but I preferred the Solidworks/SolidEdge design tree with completely different icons for the "Cut" and "Extrude" features: makes troubleshooting easier.
-AS
It's taking a little different approach to how commands are accessed and I think it's a good move. It's a switch for those who have used it, but much easier for new users. mostly because it's getting away from a dependence on th right-click context menu. I'd be interested to what you think about that.
One thing concerns me is the possibility of changing a dimension inadvertently (I was asked this).
One application would be in Library Features used to construct tools we make, i.e., adding in several features, such as, screw threads, o-ring grooves, slots etc. to create a part.
There is a convincing argument for using Inastant3D what would be the down side of this?
Have a great day,
Mike Krall