Community Page
- www.solidsmack.com/ Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
- 2 Years, 800 Posts and a Fab New Look.
- 4 Ways to Share Content Stinkin’ Quick, The Best and How They’ll Totally Advance CAD/PLM
- PTC/USER - SolidSmack on the Scene, Crispy and Cleeeeean.
- Yes You Can! Graphic Design for Print and Web Using SolidWorks
- Eeny, Meeny, What Comes Next? High End CAD on OS X.
-
Recent Comments
- Thanks a lot..this article will useful for me for reducing features by using 3D sketches.
- wow!! now i can draw a bunch of sketches and create really sweep geometry in Solid Works...thanks for your help..thanks a lot
- You should add one additional arguement into this command: Part.CompConfigProperties4 2, 0, True, "config1", False It should be: Part.CompConfigProperties4 2, 0, True, True,...
- WOW..Such a Great resource for all of us Web designers...You Rock Man !!
- Maybe assembly/use is "a piece of cake", because of the size the unit is only "cupcake"? Looks like good times.
SolidSmack
SolidWorks 3D CAD Technology Design BlogWhat you want to know about SolidWorks 2008: Sketching and Features
Started by Josh M · 10 months ago
Monday we took a look at the interface enhancements for 2008. While there are things that can be improved, like being able to customize menus, I generally see it as an improvement because it gets you closer to your design. This is particularly important when youâre starting it out
... Continue reading »
2 years ago
2 years ago
i apreciate and want to know more
thank you
2 years ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
It was not as full-on "serious" as ProE, Slightly less than SolidEdge, but not as Bright and Gaerish as Inventor.
This looks too like Inventor, not enough quality feel to it.....
WHY??????
I'm also hit sidewasy by the "Boss to a Cut and Back", this is functionality present in both ProE and Inventor, but I preferred the Solidworks/SolidEdge design tree with completely different icons for the "Cut" and "Extrude" features: makes troubleshooting easier.
-AS
1 year ago
It's taking a little different approach to how commands are accessed and I think it's a good move. It's a switch for those who have used it, but much easier for new users. mostly because it's getting away from a dependence on th right-click context menu. I'd be interested to what you think about that.
1 year ago
One thing concerns me is the possibility of changing a dimension inadvertently (I was asked this).
One application would be in Library Features used to construct tools we make, i.e., adding in several features, such as, screw threads, o-ring grooves, slots etc. to create a part.
There is a convincing argument for using Inastant3D what would be the down side of this?
Have a great day,
Mike Krall