Community Page
- www.solidsmack.com/ Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
- 2 Years, 800 Posts and a Fab New Look.
- 4 Ways to Share Content Stinkin’ Quick, The Best and How They’ll Totally Advance CAD/PLM
- PTC/USER - SolidSmack on the Scene, Crispy and Cleeeeean.
- Yes You Can! Graphic Design for Print and Web Using SolidWorks
- Eeny, Meeny, What Comes Next? High End CAD on OS X.
-
Recent Comments
- Thanks a lot..this article will useful for me for reducing features by using 3D sketches.
- wow!! now i can draw a bunch of sketches and create really sweep geometry in Solid Works...thanks for your help..thanks a lot
- You should add one additional arguement into this command: Part.CompConfigProperties4 2, 0, True, "config1", False It should be: Part.CompConfigProperties4 2, 0, True, True,...
- WOW..Such a Great resource for all of us Web designers...You Rock Man !!
- Maybe assembly/use is "a piece of cake", because of the size the unit is only "cupcake"? Looks like good times.
SolidSmack
SolidWorks 3D CAD Technology Design Blog
I occasionally choose to point the fire hose of SolidWorks tips and information into an unsuspecting person’s face without realizing how overwhelming it can be.
A few hours later I see the the expressionless blank stare of a skinless and slightly tattered face gazing, begging me to stop.
A few tips to simply get started will do just fine, ... Continue reading »
A few hours later I see the the expressionless blank stare of a skinless and slightly tattered face gazing, begging me to stop.
A few tips to simply get started will do just fine, ... Continue reading »
11 months ago
Follow this blog![put rss here]
11 months ago
11 months ago
11 months ago
11 months ago
* Think about how you build a part and assemblies. Make sure that if you need to change one of them in the future, the file does light up the feature tree in red. Modeling is as much a thought process, as it is a raw shape manipulation. The Theory of Parametic Modeling is to be respected.
* Learn differing ways to model. One example is:
-Cut away - like taking a block of clay of overall size of object, and cutting away until the object is created. Very handy to do if you are making a "family" of complex parts.
* Lock as much as you can down. Sketches most importantly. They control how your model will react to dimensional changes. Not locking down the sketch, means the model may react in unpredictable ways. It is best to make the relationships in relation to things that are constant. I prefer origin, planes, and axises.
11 months ago
Blue.....BLUUUUEE! Ah that picture brought back memories
11 months ago
11 months ago
I always like to keep it neat and clean:
I start with the most relevant assemblies then the most relevant parts, then, least relevant assemblies and parts. Whenever there’s a group of parts & assemblies that didn’t get their own sub-assembly, I like to open a special folder for it. Sometimes it’s also nice to save screws and bolts in a “fasteners” folder.
2. Assemblies:
You should always minimize the number of patterns, if 2 patterns can fit into one feature, then why not?
(2b) Also, it's always better to use a feature pattern instead of linear/circular pattern, if it's possible.
3. Sketches:
It’s impossible to suppress an entity, so instead you can use “for geometry” so that you can save a group of entities without using them physically in your model.
4. Post design:
After you finish your design there’s a chance that your parts/assemblies will be used some place else (another project). You should remove these links (mates/relations) because they tend to brake when you use them in a different project (turning from -> to ->?). so you should go to all features that include the -> symbol and start replacing the mate/relation with an autonomous one. For example, instead of using an “equal” relation between an entity in your sketch and an edge in another part, you should use a dimension that “locks” the length of the entity. This way it’s possible to use you parts in other projects. This step is efficient usually in the post design step because you’re “killing” the relations between parts/assemblies in your project.
11 months ago
11 months ago
11 months ago
11 months ago
11 months ago
9 months ago
2. Add datum axes X-axis, Y-axis, Z-axis to templates. The axes are very useful for feature design and mating.
3. Name features (mentioned above). This helps future users, plus yourself once tree gets long.
4. Use Comments. This is really helpful for identifying the purpose of obscure datum planes or features that you don't want to accidentally delete when you are cleaning up the tree. I wish there was an option to "LOCK" features so they couldn't be deleted without the comment popping up.