Community Page
- www.solidsmack.com/ Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
- 2 Years, 800 Posts and a Fab New Look.
- 4 Ways to Share Content Stinkin’ Quick, The Best and How They’ll Totally Advance CAD/PLM
- PTC/USER - SolidSmack on the Scene, Crispy and Cleeeeean.
- Yes You Can! Graphic Design for Print and Web Using SolidWorks
- Eeny, Meeny, What Comes Next? High End CAD on OS X.
-
Recent Comments
- death to Obama & his administration of evil. The AntiChrist has risen, and his name is B.H.Obama!!
- Man, I really can't understand the "lunchbot" link... Just check the website: all the rant about how bad are "plastics" (all of them??) is pure bullshit to everyone who has...
- Smacktastic! Congrats, Josh. I think all that sweat and hard work will pay off.
- Thanks a lot..this article will useful for me for reducing features by using 3D sketches.
- wow!! now i can draw a bunch of sketches and create really sweep geometry in Solid Works...thanks for your help..thanks a lot
SolidSmack
SolidWorks 3D CAD Technology Design Blog
Hop down off the copy machine for a minute cause I’ve got a treat for ya. I talked with Dan Gustafson from NextEngine. Ya know, that company that makes the comparatively inexpensive and ultra-small 3D scanner?
If you’re intersted in 3D scanning, SolidWorks Premi ... Continue reading »
If you’re intersted in 3D scanning, SolidWorks Premi ... Continue reading »
1 year ago
RE:"Think of the application your using it for, the accuracy of the data you need and how you’ll be using that data."
I need plus/minus .005" on loaded PCBs that are about 6" sq. Possible?
Many people have mentioned reviews on this product, but I've yet to see one from a 'real' user.
Thanks,
Devon
1 year ago
RapidWorks uses the Parasolid kernel and D-Cubed sketching engine just like SolidWorks does, and the process of building the model is very similar. So once the model is built, it transfers nicely and you can continue working on the model in SolidWorks as though you had started from scratch in SW.
-- Tom
www.rapidform.com
1 year ago
I have used ScanTo3D successfully for many projects. It is a great tool and with some learning has proven that it can get the job done. We have gone through an evaluation of RapidWorks in recent months. The biggest (but not only) difference between the two is simply TIME. ScanTo3D can get you there but it requires more time for tweaking sketches and in some cases manually creating features using the surfacing tools inside of SolidWorks.
RapidWorks has a much more advanced data set for refining mesh data and automated surface generation. The interface in RapidWorks is similar to SolidWorks in many respects and you do indeed build a feature tree much like SolidWorks. There are many great toolsets but the one that really impressed me was how you can create a blend (fillet) between two surfaces. The blend function will analyze the mesh and adjust the curvature of the blend to match the mesh as it blends surfaces together. They also carry both Tangent and Curvature conditions for many of their surface creation tools.
As soon as I get free of a few ongoing projects, we will be moving forward with purchasing RapidWorks. The time saved in reverse engineering models will allow us to be more responsive to our customers and more competitive in our jobs.
These comments are in no way meant to diminish the efforts that SolidWorks has put into ScanTo3D. Both are very capable packages but I think we are really talking about two different types of software here. For the occasional user where time to model isn't as much of a factor, ScanTo3D is great since it is a native SolidWorks application and those who have Premium already have it. For those that do Reverse Engineering often or even as a common business offering, RapidWorks seems to me to be a better fit.
Best Regards,
Ricky Jordan
http://www.rickyjordan.com
1 year ago
Do you know of any large scale (fit around a car) scanner. I might have a need for it in the future and since you brought up this topic thought to ask here.
1 year ago
Ben
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
that's clarified quite a lot of things for me personally that I hadn't been able to find anywhere else on the web. What carefully composed and appropriate questions you asked there Josh - I couldn't have done better myself!
In this article I get the idea of the power of the RapidWorks software, and it makes me think of the importance of a good computer and OS. Maybe Vista 64 bit? Oh no - I feel some more important still unanswered questions coming through, such as:
Is the Next Engine scanner software ready to run with the Vista 64 bit OS? And if it's not, do Next Engine know when it will be?
But thanks Josh and the other Solidworks Bloggers who contributed for clarifying quite a lot for me about these two options.
1 year ago
Some more info on RapidWorks: we'll be releasing an update in the next few weeks that makes 64 bit available for the first time. ScanStudio, the software that runs the NextEngine and does mesh optimization, etc. will also go 64 bit, probably a little bit later than RapidWorks. It would be safe to get a 64 bit OS (XP 64 is a good choice, but I know RapidWorks will run well on Vista 64 too) because you can run the 32 bit versions of SS and RW for the time being, and make the switch to 64 at no cost once they're released.
I also just confirmed with one of our engineers that RW 64 bit's liveTransfer (the data interface that pushes models into SW with feature trees) will work with SolidWorks 32 bit and I presume 64 bit as well.
- Tom
www.rapidform.com
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
My customer need to scan bus prototype in 1:1 scale.
What is the best tool and software ?
Thanks
1 year ago
I'm interested in the scanto3d option of Solidworks, but don't know
If it is the right software for what my company wants to do.
We're 3d scanning machines and all parts etc. in a warehouse, So we can
convert to solidmodels, and then convert to rapid prototyping and simulations.
any clue,
William
7 months ago