Community Page
- www.solidsmack.com/ Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
- 2 Years, 800 Posts and a Fab New Look.
- 4 Ways to Share Content Stinkin’ Quick, The Best and How They’ll Totally Advance CAD/PLM
- PTC/USER - SolidSmack on the Scene, Crispy and Cleeeeean.
- Yes You Can! Graphic Design for Print and Web Using SolidWorks
- Eeny, Meeny, What Comes Next? High End CAD on OS X.
-
Recent Comments
- Smacktastic! Congrats, Josh. I think all that sweat and hard work will pay off.
- Thanks a lot..this article will useful for me for reducing features by using 3D sketches.
- wow!! now i can draw a bunch of sketches and create really sweep geometry in Solid Works...thanks for your help..thanks a lot
- You should add one additional arguement into this command: Part.CompConfigProperties4 2, 0, True, "config1", False It should be: Part.CompConfigProperties4 2, 0, True, True,...
- WOW..Such a Great resource for all of us Web designers...You Rock Man !!
SolidSmack
SolidWorks 3D CAD Technology Design Blog
Just about everybody wishes SolidWorks could do this or that or complains that it doesn’t do something really cool. I could throw down a list of things I donât like, but thatâs just makes the selection of fresh organic produce seem even worse than it actually is.
... Continue reading »
1 år dage siden
1 år dage siden
2. The ability to create CNC Code on the fly in SolidWorks. Another view on this, in SolidWorks I specify a specific CNC Machine (HAAS model xxx). Then, I load a chunk of Material into the virtual machine. Then I select a Face, chose to Drill a Hole for example, and in SolidWorks the correct Tool is chosen and it drills the Hole. The Tool Selection and G Code are created at the same time.
3. Real time Electrical Circuit creation; build a PCB, load the components, apply 'electrical power' and see the results. Is the desired current generated?
4. Hey Scott Harris, are you gettin' all this?
Devon Sowell
http://www.3-ddesignsolutions.com
1 år dage siden
2. Never mind the work at all, just send me the money
3. A System with a Terabyte of memory and a black hole for a hard drive whose access time is so fast that I actually get my projects finished the day before I'm asked to start them.
4. Software thats so intuitive it actually reads your mind and tells you through the pc speaker, using Mikeys voice from American Chopper - "that designs a piece of crap - and you are a wanker"
5. A Brain transplant so I keep up to speed with all this new Solidworks stuff
5.
1 år dage siden
1 år dage siden
1 år dage siden
Have it be a slider bar that you could slide back to the very beginning of your file, add bookmarks along this slider that tell of revisions, prototypes, changes, and other user-defined properties (possible link with outlook's journal). Have the graphics screen display your model/assembly as it appeared at that time.
BUT, have an option to save without all this data to keep file sizes low.
1 år dage siden
http://www.3ds.com/products-solutions/plm-solut...
I know its going to be expensive, but this stuff is going to blow your mind...*
al
*when it ships - or not as the case may be..
1 år dage siden
Well, no matter. Dassault is doing it with V6. It gonna be cool to see some demos for once.
1 år dage siden
http://www.mcadonline.com/index.php?option=com_...
1 år dage siden
1 år dage siden
Demand linking: You know how when you insert a block into a part or a model, or a library feature, you can populate a checkbox and have it link to an external file? Why can't you do that wit model components? Virtual components is getting there, but once you save the part externally there's no going back. I think this would solve the portablity problem. This was kind of what they were going for with detached drawings, excepting that you couldn't open and edit the model.
Remove the distinction between multi-body parts and assemlbies. It's barely there right now. You can pull a BOM from a weldment, you can pull a wire-list from a route, you can save a body as a seperate part, you can insert a part into another part. You can store a new part in an assembly (as long as you don't save it while you're editing it.) So really, what difference-apart from semantics-is there between a part and an assembly? It's all a list of mutual exclusions. Fine, get rid of the exclusions and have one file extension: sldmdl.
Assembly driven parameter support: This is for your spring that needs to stretch. Basically, any parameter or dimension would have a checkbox to allow an assembly to override it. So you model your helix in it's free state and then take the pitch/height parameter and check 'allow assembly to override' (we won't call it adaptivity for obvious reasons) Insert the spring into an assembly, position and mate it as you normally and when you drag a non-fixed component pitch value changes and the spring expands or collapses Maybe allow a range of values the assembly could solve. This could also be useful for crimping terminals
Assembly driven deforms: have the ability to apply body modifiers at the assembly level-stuff like flex, deform, freeform
OK, I've ranted enough
1 år dage siden
I Have Solidworks 2007
I wisha tool which will unfold/flatpattern
a Football for me
Adolf