<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>SolidSmack - Latest Comments in Killer 3D Performance With AMD Turion X2 Ultra?</title><link>http://solidsmack.disqus.com/</link><description>SolidWorks 3D CAD Technology Design Blog</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:12:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Killer 3D Performance With AMD Turion X2 Ultra?</title><link>http://www.solidsmack.com/amd-turion-x2-ultra-3d-cad/2008-06-05/#comment-1310219</link><description>That's the entry level model, they have a 2.4Ghz ZM-86 now ready to buy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=4511" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsI...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Take a look to this baby performance and then speak.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Carmack</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:12:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Killer 3D Performance With AMD Turion X2 Ultra?</title><link>http://www.solidsmack.com/amd-turion-x2-ultra-3d-cad/2008-06-05/#comment-1310230</link><description>The Puma is an entry level platform that is not suitable for CAD.  The 2.1 GHz Turion X2 Ultra 64) actually performs slower than an entry level Core2 notebook running at the same clock speed.  There's really no comparison with true mobile workstation with a 2.5+GHz CPU and Quadro or FireGL graphics.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://laptopcom.blogspot.com/2008/06/toshiba-satellite-a305d-based-on-amd.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://laptopcom.blogspot.com/2008/06/toshiba-s...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:44:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Killer 3D Performance With AMD Turion X2 Ultra?</title><link>http://www.solidsmack.com/amd-turion-x2-ultra-3d-cad/2008-06-05/#comment-1310237</link><description>I have two demo units coming in next week.  I will post a review and our thoughts on the processor shortly after.  We are also interested in seeing what the performance will be like.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At the same time, I'm a little unsure what AMD's direction will be moving forward,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regards,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Keith</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Keith at Quantum Leap Technolo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:24:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Killer 3D Performance With AMD Turion X2 Ultra?</title><link>http://www.solidsmack.com/amd-turion-x2-ultra-3d-cad/2008-06-05/#comment-1310239</link><description>I have a Turion processor chip in my laptop, and it works phenomenal! I have always been a big fan of AMD, ever since they have been outdoing Intel. I really hope AMD will continue to perform better than Intel!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Komodo Dragon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:20:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Killer 3D Performance With AMD Turion X2 Ultra?</title><link>http://www.solidsmack.com/amd-turion-x2-ultra-3d-cad/2008-06-05/#comment-1310240</link><description>Maybe this is something for the 1337 &lt;a href="http://fastra.ua.ac.be/en/index.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://fastra.ua.ac.be/en/index.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;CAD designer it only has 4 NVIDIA 9800GX2 but it cost less then 4000 and that is less then the best CAD PC out there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marijn</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 01:42:53 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>